differences within a single entity
if numbers are human, who taught the elements how to count protons?
a single universe, dividing
a single universe, dividing from its “point of existence” – what we call our “big bang point”.
(“points” might technically be “point-like areas” but until the different regions of an area can be distinguished as different, we can only treat them together as a point – because if the differences between them can’t be distinguished, they’re not different in any meaningful way
and when the different regions of an area CAN be distinguished as different they become new point-like-areas themselves with their own internally indistinguishable regions)
the universe exists according to theory (absolutely nothing canNOT exist)
existence of the universe is proved by observation – we exist, we observe that we exist, we observe that we exist within a larger existence; that there is a sum of observable existence is proven beyond (reasonable) doubt
existence did not begin, it has always existed; absolutely nothing canNOT exist at a point
a single universe, that we observe to have started at a “big bang point”
a single universe, that we observe to be dividing from what we observe as its “point of existence” – what we call our “big bang point”
the universe is a single entity, by definition.
the discovery of a parallel universe would not mean there were two universes, it would mean there is one universe of which, up until the discovery, we’d only observed half
differences… differences…
(one bit and another
that bit, this bit
the bit over there, the bit over here
the bit before, the bit now… (and the potential bit later)
bits of the same single thing, in different parts, places, times… but in the same observable universe
bits of universe)
(bits of universe that have the exact same fundamental relationships and behaviours as number
because that’s what they are, fundamentally, relative to themselves
relative to themselves, relative to the universe
they are bits of universe
they are number)
